AI PRICES,
ONE PLACE.
Compare LLM subscriptions, API access and AI video models without translating every provider's pricing model by hand. Prices stay grouped by their real unit. Video catalogue: 88 offers across 19 models
LLM subscriptions
Plans, credits and API access
Compare monthly subscriptions, token access and credit bundles in separate price groups. Each row keeps its seller, terms and source visible.
Пока ни одной цены не собрано — попробуйте зайти позже.
AI video models
Price a video project
Clips, seconds each, resolution and aspect ratio. Two switches change which providers can do the job at all.
Describe the shoot and press Compare.
Four ways to quote the same thing
Comparing providers by hand means converting all of it in your head, per resolution, per aspect ratio. That conversion happens here instead.
The simple case. Taken verbatim.
Divided by the clip length you asked for, not the one they bill.
Multiplied by the plan's dollar rate. Credits hide the price; this shows it.
Tokens scale with width x height, so 720p costs 2.25x of 480p and 1:1 costs less than 16:9.
A published price is never mixed with a derived one
Where a provider quotes only its cheapest tier and the rest has to be inferred, the row says so. Those two kinds of number are not the same claim.
Stale beats wrong
A failed scrape leaves the previous price in place with its date, rather than replacing it with something a broken parser produced. A provider that returns nothing is treated as a failure, not as a quiet success.
Capabilities come from the provider, not from guesswork
Whether a model can take a first and last frame, which aspect ratios it accepts and how long one generation can run are read from each provider's own catalogue, because those decide whether a price is reachable at all.